[e-gold-list] Re: Gary North Response
unlinQ Marketing
marketing at unlinq.com
Wed Jun 4 18:14:25 MDT 2008
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 2:28 AM, Pete Chown <1 at 234.cx> wrote:
> The real problem with fractional-reserve banking is slightly different,
> IMO. Because of the risk that a bank collapse could spread through the
> system, most countries operate some sort of government guarantee for
> their banks. This means that the taxpayer has taken on an enormous
> potential liability. For example, the liquidity provided to Northern
> Rock is around £300 for every UK citizen. Theoretically it will be paid
> back as the markets stabilise and the Rock is able to sell assets. In
> practice, who knows.
>
> To protect themselves against this liability, governments regulate banks
> closely. I'm not sure what else they can do, bearing in mind the size of
> the bill they get when a bank fails.
They can reduce the insurance from 100% to some more reasonable amount
(perhaps 80-90%) that a non-governmental insurer would set as a cap.
In that way depositors would have good reason to treat the banks like
their investors and not ignore the risks.
--
unlinQ
Financial Services Marketing Group
---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: e-gold-list at kobly.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-e-gold-list-512001C at talk.e-gold.com
Use e-gold's Secure Randomized Keyboard (SRK) when accessing your e-gold account(s) via the web and shopping cart interfaces to help thwart keystroke loggers and common viruses.
More information about the E-gold-list
mailing list