[e-gold-list] Re: Gary North Response

unlinQ Marketing marketing at unlinq.com
Wed Jun 4 18:14:25 MDT 2008


On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 2:28 AM, Pete Chown <1 at 234.cx> wrote:


> The real problem with fractional-reserve banking is slightly different,
> IMO.  Because of the risk that a bank collapse could spread through the
> system, most countries operate some sort of government guarantee for
> their banks.  This means that the taxpayer has taken on an enormous
> potential liability.  For example, the liquidity provided to Northern
> Rock is around £300 for every UK citizen.  Theoretically it will be paid
> back as the markets stabilise and the Rock is able to sell assets.  In
> practice, who knows.
>
> To protect themselves against this liability, governments regulate banks
> closely.  I'm not sure what else they can do, bearing in mind the size of
> the bill they get when a bank fails.

They can reduce the insurance from 100% to some more reasonable amount
(perhaps 80-90%) that a non-governmental insurer would set as a cap.
In that way depositors would have good reason to treat the banks like
their investors and not ignore the risks.

-- 
unlinQ
Financial Services Marketing Group



---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: e-gold-list at kobly.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-e-gold-list-512001C at talk.e-gold.com

Use e-gold's Secure Randomized Keyboard (SRK) when accessing your e-gold account(s) via the web and shopping cart interfaces to help thwart keystroke loggers and common viruses.


More information about the E-gold-list mailing list