[e-gold-list] US tells UK banks to shut down Iran operations

[The Phoenix Dollar]

Hello e-gold,

US tells banks to shut down Iran operations
By Andrew Murray-Watson
Published: 03 December 2006

Several of the UK's largest banks fear they could face the full legislative
wrath of the US government unless they bow to Washington's pressure to shut
their operations in Iran.

It is believed that officials in President George Bush's administration have
also put pressure on banks with operations in the US, including RBS, HSBC and
Barclays, to stop acting on behalf of UK business customers in Iran. Barclays,
it is thought, has already told its corporate clients that it will not accept
deposits from transactions originating in Iran.

The finance director of an AIM-listed company with significant operations in
Iran said: "Barclays told us that it is unable to act as our bank as far as
Iran is concerned. We have not been told why." HSBC has said it will no longer
accept dollar transactions from within Iran, while RBS declined to comment.

Although the UK banks involved are listed and incorporated in the UK, all have
either a secondary listing or substantial operations in the US that makes them
potentially vulnerable to US government action.

A senior executive at one of the banks affected said: "The consequences of not
toeing the American line on Iran have not been made clear, but we were left in
no doubt that we might not want to find out."

A spokeswoman for the US Treasury Department confirmed that meetings had taken
place with senior UK bankers. However, she stressed that the talks had been set
up so that US government officials could "equip banks with information" about
the dangers of allowing Iran to remain part of the international financial community.

Business leaders in the UK have grown increasingly worried that they might fall
foul of US legal or regulatory censure for actions that take place in the UK or
in another country. It emerged last month that American victims of terrorist
attacks were pursuing civil actions against US subsidiaries of NatWest and Crédit
Lyonnais on the grounds that their parent companies provided banking facilities
in the UK and France for charities that the US Treasury Department believes has
links to Hamas, the militant Palestinian organisation.

The US has imposed unilateral sanctions on Iran - because of its alleged support
for international terrorism - and individuals found to have breached the economic
restrictions face a fine of up to $250,000 (£126,000) and 20 years in jail.

Several of the UK's largest banks fear they could face the full legislative wrath
of the US government unless they bow to Washington's pressure to shut their
operations in Iran.

It is believed that officials in President George Bush's administration have also
put pressure on banks with operations in the US, including RBS, HSBC and Barclays,
to stop acting on behalf of UK business customers in Iran. Barclays, it is thought,
has already told its corporate clients that it will not accept deposits from
transactions originating in Iran.

The finance director of an AIM-listed company with significant operations in Iran
said: "Barclays told us that it is unable to act as our bank as far as Iran is
concerned. We have not been told why." HSBC has said it will no longer accept dollar
transactions from within Iran, while RBS declined to comment.

Although the UK banks involved are listed and incorporated in the UK, all have either
a secondary listing or substantial operations in the US that makes them potentially
vulnerable to US government action.

A senior executive at one of the banks affected said: "The consequences of not toeing
the American line on Iran have not been made clear, but we were left in no doubt that
we might not want to find out."

A spokeswoman for the US Treasury Department confirmed that meetings had taken place
with senior UK bankers. However, she stressed that the talks had been set up so that
US government officials could "equip banks with information" about the dangers of
allowing Iran to remain part of the international financial community.

Business leaders in the UK have grown increasingly worried that they might fall foul
of US legal or regulatory censure for actions that take place in the UK or in another
country. It emerged last month that American victims of terrorist attacks were pursuing
civil actions against US subsidiaries of NatWest and Crédit Lyonnais on the grounds
that their parent companies provided banking facilities in the UK and France for
charities that the US Treasury Department believes has links to Hamas, the militant
Palestinian organisation.

The US has imposed unilateral sanctions on Iran - because of its alleged support for
international terrorism - and individuals found to have breached the economic restrictions
face a fine of up to $250,000 (£126,000) and 20 years in jail.
  

-- 
Best regards,

Gordon


---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: e-gold-list at kobly.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-e-gold-list-512001C at talk.e-gold.com

Use e-gold's Secure Randomized Keyboard (SRK) when accessing your e-gold account(s) via the web and shopping cart interfaces to help thwart keystroke loggers and common viruses.